(E)-Cyclooct-4-en-1-yl (2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) carbonate - CAS 1191901-33-3

(E)-Cyclooct-4-en-1-yl (2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) carbonate - CAS 1191901-33-3 Catalog number: BADC-01540

* Please be kindly noted products are not for therapeutic use. We do not sell to patients.

(E)-Cyclooct-4-en-1-yl (2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) carbonate is a linker widely used in antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).

Category
ADCs Linker
Product Name
(E)-Cyclooct-4-en-1-yl (2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) carbonate
CAS
1191901-33-3
Catalog Number
BADC-01540
Molecular Formula
C13H17NO5
Molecular Weight
267.28
(E)-Cyclooct-4-en-1-yl (2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) carbonate

Ordering Information

Catalog Number Size Price Quantity
BADC-01540 -- $--
Inquiry
Description
(E)-Cyclooct-4-en-1-yl (2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) carbonate is a linker widely used in antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).
Synonyms
TCO-NHS ester; TCO-NHS; (E)-Cyclooct-4-en-1-yl (2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) carbonate
IUPAC Name
[(4E)-cyclooct-4-en-1-yl] (2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) carbonate
Canonical SMILES
C1CC=CCCC(C1)OC(=O)ON2C(=O)CCC2=O
InChI
InChI=1S/C13H17NO5/c15-11-8-9-12(16)14(11)19-13(17)18-10-6-4-2-1-3-5-7-10/h1-2,10H,3-9H2/b2-1+
InChIKey
OUGQJOKGFAIFAQ-OWOJBTEDSA-N
Solubility
Soluble
Purity
95% rel-(1R-4E-pR)-equatorial
Shipping
Room temperature in continental US; may vary elsewhere.
Storage
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
Pictograms
Harmful
Signal Word
Warning
1. Comparison of analytical methods for antibody conjugates with application in nuclear imaging - Report from the trenches
Irene V J Feiner, Beatrice Longo, Vanessa Gómez-Vallejo, Javier Calvo, Marion Chomet, Danielle J Vugts, Albert D Windhorst, Daniel Padro, Matteo Zanda, Luka Rejc, Jordi Llop Nucl Med Biol. 2021 Nov-Dec;102-103:24-33.doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.08.001.Epub 2021 Aug 18.
Introduction:Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are widely used in nuclear imaging. Radiolabelling with positron emitting radionuclides, typically radiometals, requires the incorporation of a bifunctional chelator for the formation of the radiometal-mAb complex. Additionally, mAbs can be conjugated with small molecules capable to undergo bioorthogonal click reactions in vivo, enabling pre-targeting strategies. The determination of the number of functionalities attached to the mAb is critically important to ensure a good labelling yield or to guarantee pre-targeting efficacy. In this work, we compare three different analytical methods for the assessment of average functionalisation and heterogeneity of the conjugated mAbs. Methods:Two selected mAbs (Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab) were randomly conjugated through lysine residues with 3-10 equivalents p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine (p-NCS-Bz-DFO) or 20-200 equivalents trans-cyclooctene-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (TCO-NHS). The DFO- or TCO-to-mAb ratio were determined using three different methods: direct titration (radiometric for DFO-conjugated mAbs, photometric for TCO-conjugated mAbs), MALDI/TOF MS mass analysis (Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry), and UPLC/ESI-TOF MS mass analysis (Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry). Results:Radiometric and photometric titrations provided information on the average number of DFO and TCO functionalities per mAb respectively. MALDI/TOF MS provided equivalent results to those obtained by titration, although investigation of the heterogeneity of the resulting mixture was challenging and inaccurate. UPLC/ESI-TOF MS resulted in good peak resolution in the case of DFO-conjugated mAbs, where an accurate discrimination of the contribution of mono-, di- and tri-substituted mAbs could be achieved by mathematical fitting of the spectra. However, UPLC/ESI-TOF MS was unable to discriminate between different conjugates when the smaller TCO moiety was attached to the mAbs.Conclusions:The three techniques offered comparable results in terms of determining the average number of conjugates per mAb. Additionally, UPLC/ESI-TOF MS was able to shed a light on the heterogeneity of the resulting functionalised mAbs, especially in the case of DFO-conjugated mAbs. Finally, while using a single analytical method might not be a reliable way to determine the average functionalisation and assess the heterogeneity of the sample, a combination of these methods could substantially improve the characterization of mAb conjugates.
2. A Pretargeted Imaging Strategy for Immune Checkpoint Ligand PD-L1 Expression in Tumor Based on Bioorthogonal Diels-Alder Click Chemistry
Lin Qiu, Hui Tan, Qingyu Lin, Zhan Si, Wujian Mao, Tingting Wang, Zhequan Fu, Dengfeng Cheng, Hongcheng Shi Mol Imaging Biol. 2020 Aug;22(4):842-853.doi: 10.1007/s11307-019-01441-3.
Purpose:The use of antibodies as tracers requires labeling with isotopes with long half-lives due to their slow pharmacokinetics, which creates prohibitively high radiation dose to non-target organs. Pretargeted methodology could avoid the high radiation exposure due to the slow pharmacokinetics of antibodies. In this investigation, we reported the development of a novel pretargeted single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging strategy (atezolizumab-TCO/[99mTc]HYNIC-PEG11-Tz) for evaluating immune checkpoint ligand PD-L1 expression in tumor based on bioorthogonal Diels-Alder click chemistry.Procedures:The radioligand [99mTc]HYNIC-PEG11-Tz was achieved by the synthesis of a 6-hydrazinonicotinc acid (HYNIC) modified 1,2,4,5-tetrazine (Tz) and subsequently radiolabeled with technetium-99m (Tc-99m). The stability of [99mTc]HYNIC-PEG11-Tz was evaluated in vitro, and its blood pharmacokinetic test was performed in vivo. Atezolizumab was modified with trans-cyclooctene (TCO). The [99mTc]HYNIC-PEG11-Tz and atezolizumab-TCO interaction was tested in vitro. Pretargeted H1975 cell immunoreactivity binding and saturation binding assays were evaluated. Pretargeted biodistribution and SPECT imaging experiments were performed in H1975 and A549 tumor-bearing modal mice to evaluate the PD-L1 expression level. Results:[99mTc]HYNIC-PEG11-Tz was successfully radiosynthesized with a specific activity of 9.25 MBq/μg and a radiochemical purity above 95 % as confirmed by reversed-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC). [99mTc]HYNIC-PEG11-Tz showed favorable stability in NS, PBS, and FBS and rapid blood clearance in mice. The atezolizumab was modified with TCO-NHS ester to produce a conjugate with an average 6.4 TCO moieties as confirmed by liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer (LC-MS). Size exclusion HPLC revealed almost complete reaction between atezolizumab-TCO and [99mTc]HYNIC-PEG11-Tz in vitro, with the 1:1 Tz-to-mAb reaction providing a conversion yield of 88.65 ± 1.22 %. Pretargeted cell immunoreactivity binding and saturation binding assays showed high affinity to H1975 cells. After allowing 48 h for accumulation of atezolizumab-TCO in H1975 tumor, pretargeted in vivo biodistribution revealed high uptake of the radiotracer in the tumor with a tumor-to-muscle ratio of 27.51 and tumor-to-blood ratio of 1.91. Pretargeted SPECT imaging delineated the H1975 tumor clearly. Pretargeted biodistribution and SPECT imaging in control groups demonstrated a significantly reduced tracer accumulation in the A549 tumor.Conclusions:We have developed a HYNIC-modified Tz derivative, and the HYNIC-PEG11-Tz was labeled with Tc-99m with a high specific activity and radiochemical purity. [99mTc]HYNIC-PEG11-Tz reacted rapidly and almost completely towards atezolizumab-TCO in vitro with the 1:1 Tz-to-mAb reaction. SPECT imaging using the pretargeted strategy (atezolizumab-TCO/[99mTc]HYNIC-PEG11-Tz) demonstrated high-contrast images for high PD-L1 expression H1975 tumor and a low background accumulation of the probe. The pretargeted imaging strategy is a powerful tool for evaluating PD-L1 expression in xenograft mice tumor models and a potential candidate for translational clinical application.
The molarity calculator equation

Mass (g) = Concentration (mol/L) × Volume (L) × Molecular Weight (g/mol)

The dilution calculator equation

Concentration (start) × Volume (start) = Concentration (final) × Volume (final)

This equation is commonly abbreviated as: C1V1 = C2V2

Why Choose BOC Sciences?

Customer Support

Providing excellent 24/7 customer service and support

Project Management

Offering 100% high-quality services at all stages

Quality Assurance

Ensuring the quality and reliability of products or services

Global Delivery

Ensuring timely delivery of products worldwide

Questions & Comments
Verification code
Send Inquiry
Verification code
Inquiry Basket